Technological advancements and environmental awareness have driven industries to seek more sustainable solutions. In the cooling sector, particularly for data centers, the transition to alternative refrigerants with lower global warming potential (GWP) has become paramount. Regulations such as the European Union’s F-gas legislation and international agreements like the Montreal Protocol have accelerated the creation and implementation of low GWP refrigerants. Climanusa, as a leading Distributor Chiller Data Center in Indonesia, deeply understands the complexities and opportunities within this shift.
The implementation of alternative refrigerants is not merely theoretical; they are already extensively used in equipment available in the marketplace. Charles Allgood, Ph.D., a refrigerants technology leader, notes that the adoption of low GWP refrigerants varies by region and industry segment. In Indonesia, with its rapidly growing data center industry, adapting to these changes is crucial. Cooling systems in data centers often house thousands of pounds of refrigerants, making them a primary focus area for GWP reduction initiatives.
While these new refrigerants offer significant environmental benefits, integrating them into existing equipment presents challenges. Brian S. Smith, director of global marketing for chiller products, highlights the fundamental differences between new refrigerants and the fluids they are intended to replace. In some instances, retrofitting newer fluids into existing equipment can lead to a significant loss of performance. Additionally, safety concerns such as flammability may arise. However, with equipment re-optimization by manufacturers and the expertise of solution providers like Climanusa, many of these trade-offs can be entirely offset. Knowing how to install new refrigerants into existing technology or optimize newer equipment while maintaining safety is vital as the industry continues its transition to lower GWP refrigerants.
Industry Applications: Commercial Refrigeration and Chillers
Commercial refrigeration, including data centers, is “where a lot of the action is right now” concerning the implementation of alternative refrigerants. Thousands of data centers have converted their existing refrigeration systems to operate on new fluids. These retrofitting and conversion processes often require only minor changes, allowing existing systems to continue using the newer fluids. The cost of converting data center cooling systems can vary, and many facilities choose to keep their existing equipment unless the systems are significantly older.
Allgood explains that, for the most part, one might need to change the oil in the system, the seals and gaskets, and some people perform hardware upgrades as well. R-22 based systems, for example, have become expensive to maintain, and a good many data centers in Indonesia are removing that refrigerant from their systems and putting in new low GWP gas such as R-449A. This transition should be done in a smooth and orderly fashion to avoid being caught by surprise with emergency repairs that incur significant costs.
Several key steps need to be followed when converting a system running on R-22 to run on R-449A. These include collecting baseline data, changing the oil, charging the system with R-449A, and adjusting the thermal expansion valves. It’s important to note that the pressure in the evaporator coil will be slightly higher, and the discharge temperature will be cooler, all of which require careful adjustment by experienced technicians. Climanusa possesses the expertise to ensure smooth and efficient conversions for data center cooling needs.
Chillers are another application where these new refrigerants are on the market and in use. In data centers, chillers typically house thousands of pounds of refrigerants and are contained in machine rooms or outside a building with water circulating into the building. This helps contain the refrigerant with leak detectors, restricted access, and not as much public exposure as in a supermarket. However, a particular challenge arises as we move to lower GWP refrigerants: some options are starting to cross the line into mild flammability. This raises concerns within the chiller community about putting thousands of pounds of a flammable refrigerant into a chiller.
Fortunately, some refrigerants entering the market have very, very low GWPs and are also nonflammable. There is significant interest in these fluids, but in some cases, they will require quite a bit of redesign because they may be a different pressure fluid than what’s being used today. For example, R-514A is a nonflammable refrigerant that is a lower pressure, higher boiling refrigerant, which is a different pressure range than R-134A. However, it is a very close match to R-123, the primary low-pressure chiller fluid used today. Similarly, R-513A is a nonflammable refrigerant that is a close match to R-134a. To convert a system to a new refrigerant with different properties, a complete redesign of a system might be required, with the compressor being a main feature of the redesign. Climanusa can assist in this assessment and redesign process, ensuring that the implemented solution is optimal for data center facilities in Indonesia.
The focus of refrigerant manufacturers has been to develop fluids that closely match the existing fluids they will replace to ease the conversion process. This approach minimizes the need for significant changes to existing equipment, making the transition more efficient and cost-effective for data center operators.
Conversion Challenges and Practical Tips
When converting systems with new refrigerants, there are several concerns and challenges that need to be addressed. One is the substitution of refrigerants that have a different designation, which requires a reassessment of facility code compliance, including chiller components such as safety relief devices and vent piping. Smith emphasizes that equipment designed for one refrigerant safety classification should not be applied to a different classification. In all cases, a proper equipment and facility safety assessment is required. Handling, storage, operating, and maintenance practices should also be carefully analyzed.
Smith advises avoiding retrofitting installed equipment as long as the HFCs being used are still available and more cost-effective than their replacements. Converting an installed system to a new fluid should only be considered when necessary due to availability reasons or when the installed unit is several years old. In the latter case, energy-efficiency improvements incorporated in new equipment over the past few years can be significant and, in many cases, can offer very attractive paybacks. Climanusa, as a Distributor Chiller Data Center, can provide cost-benefit analyses to aid in these decisions.
Andy Pearson, Ph.D., C.Eng., Fellow ASHRAE, suggests that during a refrigerant conversion, the client should perform as much refurbishment work as possible, such as cleaning condensers, overhauling compressors, replacing insulation, repainting, rewiring, and replacing outdated controls and sensors. While this makes the refrigerant replacement much more expensive, it gives the plant a new lease on life and probably extends its operation by many years.
Several common challenges arise when converting a system to a low GWP refrigerant, typically involving at least one of these issues:
- Different Safety Classification: Does the refrigerant have a different safety classification (e.g., flammability)?
- Higher Operating Pressure: Does it require a higher operating pressure?
- Wider Glide: Does the new refrigerant have a wider glide (temperature difference between dew point and bubble point) than the old one?
- Different Gas Density: Does the gas have a different density, causing problems in the compressor? Pearson cited a case of major compressor damage in a reciprocating compressor caused by denser suction gas, resulting in broken suction valve springs. The compressor was operating within the old operating limits for the old refrigerant, but the saturated suction temperature was too low for the new refrigerant.
- Refrigerant Separation: In another case, the configuration of the high-pressure receiver caused a wide glide refrigerant to separate, resulting in very high discharge pressures that lifted the relief valve and vented a portion of the new, expensive refrigerant.
One of the most obvious problems in the conversion process is the condition of the seals, particularly the O-rings. The process of reversing the pressure loading on the O-ring when removing the old fluid and then reestablishing the O-ring under positive pressure has been enough to cause leaks. Pearson concluded that it was better for both the contractor and the client to insist on a full change of every operating seal that could be accessed while the plant was evacuated.
If changing the refrigerant type means changing the pressure rating, the system might need to be strength-pressure tested at the new rating. This is fraught with difficulty, particularly where pressure vessels are concerned. Pearson advises that a vessel cannot be recertified for a pressure higher than the manufacturer’s original design. Occasionally, however, the vessel is already rated for the higher pressure, and only the pipework needs to be re-rated. Higher-rated, new relief valves are then required, and system documentation will need to be updated. Climanusa ensures that all these aspects are properly considered and implemented.
Flammability Concerns and the Future
Another significant concern is flammability, which could require new equipment design. Allgood explains that, with a few exceptions, the refrigerants with the lowest GWPs are going to require equipment that is capable of safely operating on flammable refrigerants. This will involve all new designs, and a lot of work is currently underway for the next generation.
However, depending on the application, such as systems with large charge sizes, the market might not drive down GWP to take on flammability. Minor notes that reaching very low GWP often means introducing flammability. However, with moderate GWP, which is still a significant reduction from current refrigerants, it is possible to remain nonflammable. This depends on how far the market needs to reduce GWP. A system’s charge size, location, and proximity to people must be taken into consideration when conducting risk assessments.
The industry is actively working to develop safe handling procedures, including research projects like ASHRAE Research Project RP-1807, which provides guidelines for flammable refrigerant handling, transporting, storing, and equipment servicing and installation. Climanusa, as a leading solution provider, constantly follows these guideline developments to ensure safety and compliance in all its installations.
It is crucial for data centers in Indonesia to understand that the transition to low GWP refrigerants is an ongoing process that requires careful planning, investment, and partnership with experts. With deep expertise in cooling systems and as a prominent Distributor Chiller Data Center, Climanusa is ready to guide you through this transition, ensuring that your data center remains efficient, safe, and compliant with evolving regulations.
Conclusion
The conversion to alternative refrigerants with low GWP is an unavoidable and crucial step for the sustainability of the cooling industry, especially in the critical data center sector. While technical, operational, and safety challenges may arise, the right solutions are available through research, development, and the implementation of best practices. Partnering with experienced solution providers like Climanusa is key to navigating these complexities and ensuring a successful and sustainable transition. By focusing on efficiency, safety, and compliance, data centers in Indonesia can continue to operate optimally while minimizing their environmental impact.
Climanusa: Your Premier Choice as a Trusted Distributor Chiller Data Center in Indonesia for a Sustainable Cooling Future!
For more information, please click here.
–A.M.G–
